The authors are indebted to numerous individuals and organizations
who gave their time, research materials, and expertise on affairs in the
nations of the Transcaucasus to provide data, perspective, and material
support for this volume. The collection of accurate and current
information was assisted greatly by the contributions of Professor
Stephen Jones of Mount Holyoke College, Dee Ann Holisky and Betty Blair
of Azerbaijan International, and Joseph Masih of the Armenian
Assembly of America. The authors acknowledge the generosity of
individuals and public and private agencies including Azerbaijan
International, the Embassy of Azerbaijan, and the White House Photo
Office, who allowed their photographs to be used in this study.
Thanks also go to Ralph K. Benesch, who oversees the Country
Studies/Area Handbook Program for the Department of the Army. In
addition, the authors appreciate the advice and guidance of Sandra W.
Meditz, Federal Research Division coordinator of the handbook series.
Special thanks go to Marilyn L. Majeska, who supervised editing; Andrea
T. Merrill, who managed production; David P. Cabitto, who designed the
book cover and the illustrations on the title page of each chapter,
provided graphics support, and, together with Thomas D. Hall, prepared
the maps; and Helen Fedor, who obtained and organized the photographs.
The following individuals are gratefully acknowledged as well: Vincent
Ercolano, who edited the chapters; Barbara Edgerton and Izella Watson,
who did the word processing; Catherine Schwartzstein, who performed the
final prepublication editorial review; Joan C. Cook, who compiled the
index; and Stephen C. Cranton and David P. Cabitto, who prepared the
cameraready copy.
<"../azerbaijan/index.html">Azerbaijan
At the end of 1991, the formal liquidation of the Soviet Union was
the surprisingly swift result of partially hidden decrepitude and
centrifugal forces within that empire. Of the fifteen "new"
states that emerged from the process, many had been independent
political entities at some time in the past. Aside from their coverage
in the 1989 Soviet Union: A Country Study, none had received
individual treatment in this series, however. Armenia, Azerbaijan,
and Georgia: Country Studies is the first in a new subseries
describing the fifteen postSoviet republics, both as they existed before
and during the Soviet era and as they have developed since 1991. This
volume covers Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia, the three small nations
grouped around the Caucasus mountain range east of the Black Sea.
The marked relaxation of information restrictions, which began in the
late 1980s and accelerated after 1991, allows the reporting of nearly
complete data on every aspect of life in the three countries. Scholarly
articles and periodical reports have been especially helpful in
accounting for the years of independence in the 1990s. The authors have
described the historical, political, and social backgrounds of the
countries as the background for their current portraits. In each case,
the authors' goal was to provide a compact, accessible, and objective
treatment of five main topics: historical background, the society and
its environment, the economy, government and politics, and national
security.
In all cases, personal names have been transliterated from the
vernacular languages according to standard practice. Placenames are
rendered in the form approved by the United States Board on Geographic
Names, when available. Because in many cases the board had not yet
applied vernacular tables in transliterating official place-names at the
time of printing, the most recent Soviet-era forms have been used in
this volume. Conventional international variants, such as Moscow, are
used when appropriate. Organizations commonly known by their acronyms
(such as IMF--International Monetary Fund) are introduced by their full
names.
Autonomous republics and autonomous regions, such as the Nakhichevan
Autonomous Republic, the Ajarian Autonomous Republic, and the Abkhazian
Autonomous Republic, are introduced in their full form (before 1991
these also included the phrase "Soviet socialist"), and
subsequently referred to by shorter forms (Nakhichevan, Ajaria, and
Abkhazia, respectively).
The body of the text reflects information available as of March 1994.
Certain other portions of the text, however, have been updated.
<"../azerbaijan/index.html">Azerbaijan
Historical Background
ARMENIAN CIVILIZATION HAD its beginnings in the sixth century B.C. In
the centuries following, the Armenians withstood invasions and nomadic
migrations, creating a unique culture that blended Iranian social and
political structures with Hellenic-- and later Christian--literary
traditions. For two millennia, independent Armenian states existed
sporadically in the region between the northeastern corner of the
Mediterranean Sea and the Caucasus Mountains, until the last medieval
state was destroyed in the fourteenth century. A landlocked country in
modern times, Armenia was the smallest Soviet republic from 1920 until
the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991. The future of an independent Armenia is clouded by limited
natural resources and the prospect that the military struggle to unite
the Armenians of Azerbaijan's Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Region with
the Republic of Armenia will be a long one.
The Armenians are an ancient people who speak an Indo-European
language and have traditionally inhabited the border regions common to
modern Armenia, Iran, and Turkey. They call themselves hai
(from the name of Hayk, a legendary hero) and their country Haiastan.
Their neighbors to the north, the Georgians, call them somekhi,
but most of the rest of the world follows the usage of the ancient
Greeks and refers to them as Armenians, a term derived according to
legend from the Armen tribe. Thus the Russian word is armianin,
and the Turkish is ermeni.
Armenia - History
Historical Background
ARMENIAN CIVILIZATION HAD its beginnings in the sixth century B.C. In
the centuries following, the Armenians withstood invasions and nomadic
migrations, creating a unique culture that blended Iranian social and
political structures with Hellenic-- and later Christian--literary
traditions. For two millennia, independent Armenian states existed
sporadically in the region between the northeastern corner of the
Mediterranean Sea and the Caucasus Mountains, until the last medieval
state was destroyed in the fourteenth century. A landlocked country in
modern times, Armenia was the smallest Soviet republic from 1920 until
the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991. The future of an independent Armenia is clouded by limited
natural resources and the prospect that the military struggle to unite
the Armenians of Azerbaijan's Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Region with
the Republic of Armenia will be a long one.
The Armenians are an ancient people who speak an Indo-European
language and have traditionally inhabited the border regions common to
modern Armenia, Iran, and Turkey. They call themselves hai
(from the name of Hayk, a legendary hero) and their country Haiastan.
Their neighbors to the north, the Georgians, call them somekhi,
but most of the rest of the world follows the usage of the ancient
Greeks and refers to them as Armenians, a term derived according to
legend from the Armen tribe. Thus the Russian word is armianin,
and the Turkish is ermeni.
Armenia - The Ancient Period
People first settled what is now Armenia in about 6000 B.C. The first
major state in the region was the kingdom of Urartu, which appeared
around Lake Van in the thirteenth century B.C. and reached its peak in
the ninth century B.C. Shortly after the fall of Urartu to the
Assyrians, the Indo-European-speaking proto-Armenians migrated, probably
from the west, onto the Armenian Plateau and mingled with the local
people of the Hurrian civilization, which at that time extended into
Anatolia (presentday Asian Turkey) from its center in Mesopotamia. Greek
historians first mentioned the Armenians in the mid-sixth century B.C.
Ruled for many centuries by the Persians, Armenia became a buffer state
between the Greeks and Romans to the west and the Persians and Arabs of
the Middle East. It reached its greatest size and influence under King
Tigran II, also known as Tigranes or Tigran the Great (r. 95-55 B.C.).
During his reign, Armenia stretched from the Mediterranean Sea northeast
to the Mtkvari River (called the Kura in Azerbaijan) in present-day
Georgia. Tigran and his son, Artavazd II, made Armenia a center of
Hellenic culture during their reigns.
By 30 B.C., Rome conquered the Armenian Empire, and for the next 200
years Armenia often was a pawn of the Romans in campaigns against their
Central Asian enemies, the Parthians. However, a new dynasty, the
Arsacids, took power in Armenia in A.D. 53 under the Parthian king,
Tiridates I, who defeated Roman forces in A.D. 62. Rome's Emperor Nero
then conciliated the Parthians by personally crowning Tiridates king of
Armenia. For much of its subsequent history, Armenia was not united
under a single sovereign but was usually divided between empires and
among local Armenian rulers.
Armenia - Early Christianity
After contact with centers of early Christianity at Antioch and
Edessa, Armenia accepted Christianity as its state religion in A.D. 306
(the traditional date--the actual date may have been as late as A.D.
314), following miracles said to have been performed by Saint Gregory
the Illuminator, son of a Parthian nobleman. Thus Armenians claim that
Tiridates III (A.D. 238-314) was the first ruler to officially
Christianize his people, his conversion predating the conventional date
(A.D. 312) of Constantine the Great's personal acceptance of
Christianity on behalf of the Eastern Roman Empire (the Byzantine
Empire).
Early in the fifth century A.D., Saint Mesrop, also known as
Mashtots, devised an alphabet for the Armenian language, and religious
and historical works began to appear as part of the effort to
consolidate the influence of Christianity. For the next two centuries,
political unrest paralleled the exceptional development of literary and
religious life that became known as the first golden age of Armenia. In
several administrative forms, Armenia remained part of the Byzantine
Empire until the midseventh century. In A.D. 653, the empire, finding
the region difficult to govern, ceded Armenia to the Arabs. In A.D. 806,
the Arabs established the noble Bagratid family as governors, and later
kings, of a semiautonomous Armenian state.
Armenia - The Middle Ages
Particularly under Bagratid kings Ashot I (also known as Ashot the
Great or Ashot V, r. A.D. 862-90) and Ashot III (r. A.D. 952-77), a
flourishing of art and literature accompanied a second golden age of
Armenian history. The relative prosperity of other kingdoms in the
region enabled the Armenians to develop their culture while remaining
segmented among jurisdictions of varying degrees of autonomy granted by
the Arabs. Then, after eleventh-century invasions from the west by the
Byzantine Greeks and from the east by the Seljuk Turks, the independent
kingdoms in Armenia proper collapsed, and a new Armenian state, the
kingdom of Lesser Armenia, formed in Cilicia along the northeasternmost
shore of the Mediterranean Sea. As an ally of the kingdoms set up by the
European armies of the Crusades, Cilician Armenia fought against the
rising Muslim threat on behalf of the Christian nations of Europe until
internal rebellions and court intrigue brought its downfall, at the
hands of the Central Asian Mamluk Turks in 1375. Cilician Armenia left
notable monuments of art, literature, theology, and jurisprudence. It
also served as the door through which Armenians began emigrating to
points west, notably Cyprus, Marseilles, Cairo, Venice, and even
Holland.
The Mamluks controlled Cilician Armenia until the Ottoman Turks
conquered the region in the sixteenth century. Meanwhile, the Ottoman
Turks and the Persians divided Caucasian Armenia to the northeast
between the sixteenth and eighteenth centuries. The Persians dominated
the area of modern Armenia, around Lake Sevan and the city of Erevan.
From the fifteenth century until the early twentieth century, most
Armenians were ruled by the Ottoman Turks through the millet system,
which recognized the ecclesiastical authority of the Armenian Apostolic
Church over the Armenian people.
Armenia - Between Russia and Turkey
Beginning in the eighteenth century, the Russian Empire played a
growing role in determining the fate of the Armenians, although those in
Anatolia remained under Turkish control, with tragic consequences that
would endure well into the twentieth century.
Russian Influence Expands
In the eighteenth century, Transcaucasia (the region including the
Greater Caucasus mountain range as well as the lands to the south and
west) became the object of a military-political struggle among three
empires: Ottoman Turkey, tsarist Russia, and Safavid Persia. In 1828
Russia defeated Persia and annexed the area around Erevan, bringing
thousands of Armenians into the Russian Empire. In the next
half-century, three related processes began to intensify the political
and national consciousness of the ethnic and religious communities of
the Caucasus region: the imposition of tsarist rule; the rise of a
market and capitalist economy; and the emergence of secular national
intelligentsias. Tsarism brought Armenians from Russia and from the
former Persian provinces under a single legal order. The tsarist system
also brought relative peace and security by fostering commerce and
industry, the growth of towns, and the building of railroads, thus
gradually ending the isolation of many villages.
In the mid-nineteenth century, a major movement toward centralization
and reform, called the Tanzimat, swept through the Ottoman Empire, whose
authority had been eroded by corruption and delegation of control to
local fiefdoms. Armenian subjects benefited somewhat from these reforms;
for instance, in 1863 a special Armenian constitution was granted. When
the reform movement was ended in the 1870s by reactionary factions,
however, Ottoman policy toward subject nationalities became less
tolerant, and the situation of the Armenians in the empire began to
deteriorate rapidly.
Armenia - National Self-Awareness
The Armenians themselves changed dramatically in the midnineteenth
century. An intellectual awakening influenced by Western and Russian
ideas, a new interest in Armenian history, and an increase in social
interaction created a sense of secular nationality among many Armenians.
Instead of conceiving of themselves solely as a religious community,
Armenians--especially the urban middle class--began to feel closer
kinship with Christian Europe and greater alienation from the Muslim
peoples among whom they lived.
Lacking faith in reform within the empire, Armenian leaders began to
appeal to the European powers for assistance. In 1878 Armenian delegates
appeared at the Congress of Berlin, where the European powers were
negotiating the disposition of Ottoman territories. Although Armenian
requests for European protection went largely unanswered in Berlin, the
"Armenian question" became a point of contention in the
complex European diplomacy of the late nineteenth century, with Russia
and Britain acting as the chief sponsors of Armenian interests on
various issues.
The Armenian independence movement began as agitation on behalf of
liberal democracy by writers, journalists, and teachers. But by the last
decade of the nineteenth century, moderate nationalist intellectuals had
been pushed aside by younger, more radical socialists. Armenian
revolutionary parties, founded in the early 1890s in Russia and Europe,
sent their cadres to organize in Turkey. Because of the self-destruction
of one major party, the Social Democratic Hnchaks, and the relative
isolation of the liberals and the "internationalist" Social
Democrats in the cities of Transcaucasia, the more nationalist of the
socialist parties, the Armenian Revolutionary Federation (ARF, also
known as the Dashnak, a shortened form of its Armenian name), emerged by
the early twentieth century as the only real contender for Armenian
loyalties. The ARF favored Armenian autonomy in both the Russian and the
Ottoman empires rather than full independence for an Armenia in which
Russian- and Ottomanheld components would be unified.
In the last decades of the nineteenth century, the Armenians'
tendency toward Europeanization antagonized Turkish officials and
encouraged their view that Armenians were a foreign, subversive element
in the sultan's realm. By 1890 the rapid growth of the Kurdish
population in Anatolia, combined with the immigration of Muslims from
the Balkans and the Caucasus, had made the Armenian population of
Anatolia an increasingly endangered minority. In 1895 Ottoman suspicion
of the westernized Armenian population led to the massacre of 300,000
Armenians by special order of the Ottoman government.
Meanwhile, on the other side of the Russian border, Armenian churches
and schools were closed and church property was confiscated in 1903.
Tatars massacred Armenians in several towns and cities in 1905, and
fifty-two Armenian nationalist leaders in Russia were tried en masse for
underground activities in 1912.
Armenia - The Young Turks
The Armenian population that remained in the Ottoman Empire after the
1895 massacre supported the 1908 revolution of the Committee of Union
and Progress, better known as the Young Turks, who promised liberal
treatment of ethnic minorities. However, after its revolution succeeded,
the Young Turk government plotted elimination of the Armenians, who were
a significant obstacle to the regime's evolving nationalist agenda.
In the early stages of World War I, in 1915 Russian armies advanced
on Turkey from the north and the British attempted an invasion from the
Mediterranean. Citing the threat of internal rebellion, the Ottoman
government ordered large-scale roundups, deportations, and systematic
torture and murder of Armenians beginning in the spring of 1915.
Estimates vary from 600,000 to 2 million deaths out of the prewar
population of about 3 million Armenians. By 1917 fewer than 200,000
Armenians remained in Turkey.
Whatever the exact dimensions of the genocide, Armenians suffered a
demographic disaster that shifted the center of the Armenian population
from the heartland of historical Armenia to the relatively safer eastern
regions held by the Russians. Tens of thousands of refugees fled to the
Caucasus with the retreating Russian armies, and the cities of Baku and
Tbilisi filled with Armenians from Turkey. Ethnic tensions rose in
Transcaucasia as the new immigrants added to the pressures on the
limited resources of the collapsing Russian Empire. )
Armenia - World War I and Its Consequences
As was the case for most of Europe, World War I changed Armenia's
geopolitical situation. The war also precipitated an ethnic disaster of
rare magnitude and brought the Armenians who remained in their native
territory into a new type of empire.
Postwar Realignment
Between 1915 and 1917, Russia occupied virtually the entire Armenian
part of the Ottoman Empire. Then in October 1917, the Bolshevik victory
in Russia ended that country's involvement in World War I, and Russian
troops left the Caucasus. In the vacuum that remained, the Armenians
first joined a Transcaucasian federation with Azerbaijan and Georgia,
both of which, however, soon proved to be unreliable partners. The
danger posed by the territorial ambitions of the Ottoman Turks and the
Azerbaijanis finally united the Caucasian Armenian population in support
of the ARF program for autonomy. In May 1918, an independent Armenian
republic was declared; its armies continued to fight on the Allied side
south of the Caucasus until the Ottoman Empire surrendered in October
1918. The independent republic endured from May 1918 to December 1920.
In the new government, ARF leaders R.I. Kachazuni and A.I. Khatisian
became prime minister and foreign minister, respectively.
The Republic of Armenia included the northeastern part of present-day
eastern Turkey, west along the Black Sea coast past Trabzon and
southwest past Lake Van. But Armenia's precarious independence was
threatened from within by the terrible economic conditions that followed
the war in the former Ottoman Empire and, by 1920, by the territorial
ambitions of Soviet Russia and the nationalist Turks under Kemal Atatürk.
Atatürk had rehabilitated Turkey rapidly under a new democratic system,
but the ruling party still hoped to create a larger state by taking
territory in western Armenia from which Armenians had been driven. In
defending its independence, the Republic of Armenia waited in vain,
however, for the material and military aid promised at the Paris Peace
Conference in 1919. The Allies' memories of the 1915 massacre faded as
war weariness and isolationism dominated their foreign policy.
In agreeing to the 1920 Treaty of Sèvres, the World War I Allies and
Turkey recognized Armenian independence; as part of the treaty, Armenia
received some disputed territory in what had been the Ottoman Empire.
However, most of western Armenia remained in Turkish hands. Eastern
Armenia, ravaged by warfare, migration, and disease, had an Armenian
population of only 720,000 by 1920. Caught between the advancing Turks
and the Red Army, which had already occupied neighboring Azerbaijan, in
November 1920 the ARF government made a political agreement with the
communists to enter a coalition government. The Treaty of
Aleksandropol', signed by this government with Turkey, returned
Armenia's northern Kars District to Russia and repudiated the existence
of Armenian populations in newly expanded Turkey.
Armenia - Into the Soviet Union
During the rule of Joseph V. Stalin (in power 1926-53), Armenian
society and its economy were changed dramatically by Moscow policy
makers. In a period of twenty-five years, Armenia was industrialized and
educated under strictly prescribed conditions, and nationalism was
harshly suppressed. After Stalin's death, Moscow allowed greater
expression of national feeling, but the corruption endemic in communist
rule continued until the very end in 1991. The last years of communism
also brought disillusionment in what had been one of the most loyal
republics in the Soviet Union until the late 1980s.
Stalinist Restructuring
Stalin's radical restructuring of the Soviet economic and political
systems at the end of the 1920s ended the brief period of moderate rule
and mixed economy under what was known as the New Economic Policy. Under
Stalin the Communist Party of Armenia (CPA) used police terror to
strengthen its political hold on the population and suppress all
expressions of nationalism. At the height of the Great Terror
orchestrated by Stalin in 1936-37, the ranks of CPA leaders and
intellectuals were decimated by Lavrenti Beria, political commissar for
the Transcaucasian republics.
Stalin's enforced social and economic engineering improved literacy
and education and built communications and industrial infrastructures
where virtually none had existed in tsarist times. As they emerged from
the Stalin era in the 1950s, Armenians were more mobile, better
educated, and ready to benefit from the less repressive policies of
Stalin's successor, Nikita S. Khrushchev (in power 1953-64). The years
of industrialization had promoted an upward social mobility through
which peasants became workers; workers became foremen or managers; and
managers became party and state officials.
Armenia - Communism after Stalin
After Stalin's death in 1953, Moscow granted the republic more
autonomy in decision making, which meant that the local communist elite
increased its power and became entrenched in Armenian politics in the
1950s and 1960s. Although overt political opposition remained tightly
restricted, expressions of moderate nationalism were viewed with greater
tolerance. Statues of Armenian national heroes were erected, including
one of Saint Vartan, the fifth-century defender of Armenian
Christianity.
Even as Armenia continued its transformation from a basically
agrarian nation to an industrial, urban society--by the early 1980s,
only a third of Armenians lived in the countryside--the ruling elite
remained largely unchanged. As a result, corruption and favoritism
spread, and an illegal "second economy" of black markets and
bribery flourished. In 1974 Moscow sent a young engineer, Karen
Demirchian, to Erevan to clean up the old party apparatus, but the new
party chief soon accommodated himself to the corrupt political system he
had inherited.
Armenia - The New Nationalism
Three issues combined by 1988 to stimulate a broad-based Armenian
nationalist movement. First, the urbanization and industrialization of
Armenia had brought severe ecological problems, the most threatening of
which was posed by a nuclear power plant at Metsamor, west of Erevan.
Second, many Armenians were angered by the pervasive corruption and
arrogance of the communist elite, which had become entrenched as a
privileged ruling class. Third and most immediate, Armenians were
increasingly concerned about the status of Nagorno-Karabakh, an
autonomous region of Azerbaijan having nearly 200,000 Armenians living
within Azerbaijan under Azerbaijani rule, isolated from mainstream
Armenian culture.
Control of Nagorno-Karabakh (the conventional geographic term is
based on the Russian for the phrase "mountainous Karabakh")
had been contested by the briefly independent republics of Armenia and
Azerbaijan after World War I. In 1924 the Soviet government designated
the region an autonomous region under Azerbaijani jurisdiction within
the TSFSR. At the time, 94.4 percent of the estimated 131,500 people in
the district were Armenian. Between 1923 and 1979, the Armenian
population of the enclave dropped by about 1,000, comprising only about
76 percent of the population by the end of the period. In the same
period, the Azerbaijani population quintupled to 37,000, or nearly 24
percent of the region's population. Armenians feared that their
demographic decline in Nagorno-Karabakh would replicate the fate of
another historically Armenian region, Nakhichevan, which the Soviet
Union had designated an autonomous republic under Azerbaijani
administration in 1924. In Nakhichevan the number of Armenians had
declined from about 15,600 (15 percent of the total) in 1926 to about
3,000 (1.4 percent of the total) in 1979, while in the same period
immigration and a higher birth rate had increased the Azerbaijani
population from about 85,400 (85 percent) to 230,000, or nearly 96
percent of the total.
In addition to fearing the loss of their numerical superiority,
Armenians in Nagorno-Karabakh resented restrictions on the development
of the Armenian language and culture in the region. Although the
Armenians generally lived better than Azerbaijanis in neighboring
districts, their standard of living was not as high as that of their
countrymen in Armenia. Hostile to the Azerbaijanis, whom they blamed for
their social and cultural problems, the vast majority of Karabakh
Armenians preferred to learn Russian rather than Azerbaijani, the
language of Azerbaijan. As early as the 1960s, clashes occurred between
the Karabakh Armenians and the Azerbaijanis, and Armenian intellectuals
petitioned Moscow for redress of their situation in Nagorno-Karabakh. )
A series of escalating attacks and reprisals between the two sides
began in early 1988. Taking advantage of the greater freedom introduced
by the glasnost and perestroika policies of Soviet leader Mikhail S. Gorbachev (in power
1985-91) in the late 1980s, Armenians held mass demonstrations in favor
of uniting NagornoKarabakh with Armenia. In response to rumored Armenian
demands, Azerbaijanis began fleeing the region. A two-day rampage in the
industrial town of Sumgait, northwest of Baku, resulted in the deaths of
more than 100 Armenians. During 1988, while Moscow hesitated to take
decisive action, Armenians grew increasingly disillusioned with
Gorbachev's programs, and Azerbaijanis sought to protect their interests
by organizing a powerful anti-Armenian nationalist movement.
Armenia - Nagorno-Karabakh and Independence
The conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh (often called simply Karabakh)
served as a catalyst for nationalist movements following the precipitous
decline of the Soviet Union in the late 1980s. In the early 1990s, the
struggle defied all negotiating efforts of the West and Russia.
Karabakh as a National Issue
The protests of the Armenians of Nagorno-Karabakh against Azerbaijani
rule began in the spirit of perestroika, but the movement
evolved quickly into a political organization, the Karabakh Committee, a
broad anticommunist coalition for democracy and national sovereignty. In
the confusion following the earthquake that devastated northern Armenia
in December 1988, Soviet authorities tried to stem the growing
opposition to their rule by arresting the leaders of the committee. The
attempt by the CPA to rule in Armenia without support from Armenian
nationalists only worsened the political crisis. In March 1989, many
voters boycotted the general elections for the Soviet Union's Congress
of People's Deputies. Massive demonstrations were held to demand the
release of the members of the committee, and, in the elections to the
Armenian Supreme Soviet, the legislative body of the republic, in May,
Armenians chose delegates identified with the Karabakh cause. At that
time, the flag of independent Armenia was flown for the first time since
1920. The release of the Karabakh Committee followed the 1989 election;
for the next six months, the nationalist movement and the Armenian
communist leadership worked as uncomfortable allies on the Karabakh
issue.
Gorbachev's 1989 proposal for enhanced autonomy for NagornoKarabakh
within Azerbaijan satisfied neither Armenians nor Azerbaijanis, and a
long and inconclusive conflict erupted between the two peoples. In
September 1989, Azerbaijan began an economic blockade of Armenia's vital
fuel and supply lines through its territory, which until that time had
carried about 90 percent of Armenia's imports from the other Soviet
republics. In June 1989, numerous unofficial nationalist organizations
joined together to form the Armenian Pannational Movement (APM), to
which the Armenian government granted official recognition.
Armenia - The Karabakh Crisis Escalates, 1989
The Azerbaijani-Armenian conflict escalated steadily in the summer
and fall of 1989. Both the APM and the newly formed Azerbaijani Popular
Front (APF) called for abolition of the Special Administrative Committee
that Gorbachev had established to manage Nagorno-Karabakh. The Armenians
held to their position that the region must become part of Armenia, and
radical Azerbaijanis called for abolition of Karabakh autonomy. As
hundreds of thousands of Azerbaijanis demonstrated in Baku, their
government further restricted the flow of goods and fuel into Karabakh
and Armenia. In August 1989, Karabakh Armenians responded by electing
their own National Council, which declared the secession of Karabakh
from Azerbaijan and its merger with Armenia. The Armenian Supreme Soviet
then declared the Karabakh National Council the sole legitimate
representative of the Karabakh people. The Azerbaijani Supreme Soviet
responded by abrogating the autonomy of both Karabakh and Nakhichevan.
Although the declarations and counter declarations of mid1989 were
ultimately declared invalid by the Supreme Soviet of the Soviet Union,
and although both Armenia and Azerbaijan continued to be governed by
communist parties, neither republic was willing to obey Moscow's
directives on the Karabakh issue. In November 1989, in frustration at
its inability to bring the parties together, the Supreme Soviet of the
Soviet Union abolished the Special Administrative Committee and returned
direct control of Karabakh to Azerbaijan. Rejecting Moscow's decision,
the Armenian Supreme Soviet declared Karabakh a part of Armenia in
December 1989.
After more than two years of the Karabakh conflict, Armenia had gone
from being one of the most loyal Soviet republics to complete loss of
confidence in Moscow. Gorbachev's unwillingness to grant Karabakh to
Armenia and his failure to end the blockade convinced Armenians that the
Kremlin considered it politically advantageous to back the more numerous
Muslims. Even the invasion of Azerbaijan by Soviet troops in January
1990, ostensibly to stop pogroms against Armenians in Baku, failed to
dampen the growing anti-Soviet mood among Armenians.
Armenia - A New Political Climate
The resignation of Suren Harutiunian as first secretary of the CPA in
April 1990 and the triumph of the APM in the elections of the spring and
summer of 1990 signaled the end of the old party elite and the rise of a
new Armenian political class that had matured during the two years of
tensions over Karabakh. The newly elected Armenian parliament (which
retained the Soviet-era name Supreme Soviet or Supreme Council) chose
Levon Ter-Petrosian instead of the new CPA first secretary as its
chairman, and hence as head of state of the republic.
With the APM in power and the communists in opposition, the
transition from Soviet-style government to an independent democratic
state began in earnest. The new government faced a nearly complete
collapse of order in the republic. Buildings were seized by armed men in
Erevan, and several independent militia groups operated in Erevan as
well as on the Azerbaijani frontier. Frustrated by the Azerbaijani
blockade and determined to defend their republic and Karabakh, members
of Armenia's Fidain (whose name was taken from an Arabic term literally
meaning "one who sacrifices himself" and recalling the
Armenian freedom fighters of the turn of the century) raided arsenals
and police stations to arm themselves for the coming battles. In July
Gorbachev demanded immediate disarmament of the Armenian militias and
threatened military intervention if they did not comply. In response,
Ter-Petrosian's government itself disarmed the independent militias and
restored order in Erevan.
On August 23, 1990, Armenia formally declared its intention to become
sovereign and independent, with Nagorno-Karabakh an integral part of
what now would be known as the Republic of Armenia rather than the
Armenian Soviet Socialist Republic. The Armenian nation was defined
broadly to include not only those living in the territory of the
republic but also the worldwide Armenian émigré population as well.
In redefining Armenian national interests, the government
acknowledged--but temporarily put aside--the painful question of
Armenian genocide, having in mind improved relations with traditional
enemies Turkey and Iran. This policy prompted strong criticism from
extreme nationalist groups that wanted to recover territory lost to
Turkey in World War I. The CPA was also vehemently critical.
Armenia - Independence
In January 1991, the Armenian Supreme Soviet decided not to
participate in Gorbachev's planned referendum on preserving the Soviet
Union. In March the parliament announced that, instead, the republic
would hold its own referendum in September, in compliance with the
procedure outlined in the Soviet constitution for a republic to secede.
Although literal compliance would mean that Armenia would not be fully
independent for five years after the referendum, Moscow soon moved to
change Armenia's course. Without notifying the Armenian government,
Moscow sent paratroopers to the republic in early May, ostensibly to
protect Soviet defense installations in Armenia. Ter-Petrosian's
official statement in reaction characterized the move as a virtual
declaration of war by the Soviet Union.
In August 1991, when a self-proclaimed emergency committee attempted
to overthrow Gorbachev and take control in Moscow, the Armenian
government refused to sanction its actions. Fearing an extension of the
Soviet incursion of May, Ter-Petrosian approached the Moscow coup very
cautiously. The republic's Defense Committee secretly resolved to have
the Armenian armed forces go underground and wage guerrilla warfare.
Ter-Petrosian, who believed that Gorbachev's personal blunders,
indecisiveness, and concessions to conservative communists were to blame
for the coup, was overjoyed when the conservatives were defeated. But
the coup itself convinced Armenians of the need to move out of the
Soviet Union as rapidly as possible, and it validated TerPetrosian 's
refusal to participate in the revival of the Soviet Union advocated by
Gorbachev.
Within two months of the coup, Armenians went to the polls twice. In
September 1991, over 99 percent of voters approved the republic's
commitment to independence. The immediate aftermath of that vote was the
Armenian Supreme Soviet's declaration of full independence, on September
23, in disregard of the constitution's restraints on secession. Then in
October, Ter-Petrosian was elected overwhelmingly as president of the
republic. He now had a popular mandate to carry out his vision of
Armenian independence and self-sufficiency.
As political changes occurred within the republic, armed conflict
continued in Nagorno-Karabakh during 1991. Armenia officially denied
supporting the "Nagorno-Karabakh defense forces" that were
pushing Azerbaijani forces out of the region; Armenia also accused the
Soviet Union of supporting Azerbaijan as punishment for Armenia's
failure to sign Gorbachev's new Union Treaty. In turn, Azerbaijan called
Armenia an aggressor state whose national policy included annexation of
Azerbaijani territory.
Armenia - Postindependence Armenia
Two immediate tasks facing independent Armenia were rebuilding its
devastated economy and strengthening its fledgling democratic
institutions. But the escalating war in NagornoKarabakh and the
effective blockade of the republic by the Azerbaijanis led to a total
collapse of the economy. By early 1993, the government seemed helpless
before mounting economic and political problems. The last remaining oil
and gas pipelines through neighboring Georgia, which itself was being
torn by civil and interethnic war, were blown up by saboteurs. To
survive the cold, Armenians in Erevan cut down the city's trees, and
plans were made to start up the nuclear power plant at Metsamor. In
February 1993, demonstrations called for the resignation of the
government, but Ter-Petrosian responded by naming a new cabinet headed
by Hrant Bagratian.
While economic and political conditions deteriorated within Armenia,
the military position of the Armenians in the Karabakh struggle improved
dramatically. Various peace negotiations sponsored by Iran, Russia,
Turkey, and a nine-nation group from the Conference on Security and
Cooperation in Europe had begun in 1991 and sporadically had yielded cease-fires
that were violated almost immediately. In the spring of 1992, while the
Azerbaijani communists and the nationalist Azerbaijani Popular Front
fought for control in Baku, Karabakh Armenian forces occupied most of
Nagorno-Karabakh, took the old capital, Shusha, and drove a corridor
through the Kurdish area around Lachin to link Nagorno-Karabakh with
Armenia. But the immediate result of this victory was the collapse of
Russian-sponsored peace negotiations with Azerbaijan and the
continuation of the war.
Beginning a counteroffensive in early summer, the Azerbaijanis
recaptured some territory and created thousands of new refugees by
expelling Armenians from the villages they took. In midsummer this new
phase of the conflict stimulated a CSCEsponsored peace conference, but
Armenia stymied progress by demanding for the first time that
Nagorno-Karabakh be entirely separate from Azerbaijan.
By the end of 1992, the sides were bogged down in a bloody stalemate.
After clearing Azerbaijani forces from NagornoKarabakh and the territory
between Karabakh and Armenia, Armenian troops also advanced deep into
Azerbaijan proper--a move that brought condemnation from the United
Nations (UN) Security Council and panic in Iran, on whose borders
Armenian troops had arrived. In the first half of 1993, the Karabakh
Armenians gained more Azerbaijani territory, against disorganized
opposition. Azerbaijani resistance was weakened by the confusion
surrounding a military coup that toppled the APF government in Baku and
returned former communist party boss Heydar Aliyev to power.
The coup reinvigorated Russian efforts to negotiate a peace under the
complex terms of the three parties to the conflict: the governments of
Armenia and Azerbaijan, and the increasingly independent and assertive
Karabakh Armenians. CSCE peace proposals were uniformly rejected during
this period. Although Russia seemed poised for a triumph of crisis
diplomacy on its borders, constant negotiations in the second half of
1993 produced only intermittent cease-fires. At the end of 1993, the
Karabakh Armenians were able to negotiate with the presidents of
Azerbaijan and Russia from a position of power: they retained full
control of Nagorno-Karabakh and substantial parts of Azerbaijan proper.
Armenia - The Society and Its Environment
Physical Environment
Armenia is located in southern Transcaucasia, the region southwest of
Russia between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea. Modern Armenia
occupies part of historical Armenia, whose ancient centers were in the
valley of the Aras River and the region around Lake Van in Turkey.
Armenia is bordered on the north by Georgia, on the east by Azerbaijan,
on the southwest by the Nakhichevan Autonomous Republic of Azerbaijan,
on the south by Iran, and on the west by Turkey.
Topography and Drainage
Twenty-five million years ago, a geological upheaval pushed up the
earth's crust to form the Armenian Plateau, creating the complex
topography of modern Armenia. The Lesser Caucasus range extends through
northern Armenia, runs southeast between Lake Sevan and Azerbaijan, then
passes roughly along the Armenian-Azerbaijani border to Iran. Thus
situated, the mountains make travel from north to south difficult.
Geological turmoil continues in the form of devastating earthquakes,
which have plagued Armenia. In December 1988, the second largest city in
the republic, Leninakan (now Gyumri), was heavily damaged by a massive
quake that killed more than 25,000 people.
About half of Armenia's area of approximately 29,800 square
kilometers has an elevation of at least 2,000 meters, and only 3 percent
of the country lies below 650 meters. The lowest points are in the
valleys of the Aras River and the Debet River in the far north, which
have elevations of 380 and 430 meters, respectively. Elevations in the
Lesser Caucasus vary between 2,640 and 3,280 meters. To the southwest of
the range is the Armenian Plateau, which slopes southwestward toward the
Aras River on the Turkish border. The plateau is masked by intermediate
mountain ranges and extinct volcanoes. The largest of these, Mount
Aragats, 4,430 meters high, is also the highest point in Armenia. Most
of the population lives in the western and northwestern parts of the
country, where the two major cities, Erevan and Gyumri (which was called
Aleksandropol' during the tsarist period), are located.
The valleys of the Debet and Akstafa rivers form the chief routes
into Armenia from the north as they pass through the mountains. Lake
Sevan, 72.5 kilometers across at its widest point and 376 kilometers
long, is by far the largest lake. It lies 2,070 meters above sea level
on the plateau. Terrain is most rugged in the extreme southeast, which
is drained by the Bargushat River, and most moderate in the Aras River
valley to the extreme southwest. Most of Armenia is drained by the Aras
or its tributary, the Razdan, which flows from Lake Sevan. The Aras
forms most of Armenia's border with Turkey and Iran as well as the
border between Azerbaijan's adjacent Nakhichevan Autonomous Republic and
Iran.
Armenia - The Society and Its Environment
Physical Environment
Armenia is located in southern Transcaucasia, the region southwest of
Russia between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea. Modern Armenia
occupies part of historical Armenia, whose ancient centers were in the
valley of the Aras River and the region around Lake Van in Turkey.
Armenia is bordered on the north by Georgia, on the east by Azerbaijan,
on the southwest by the Nakhichevan Autonomous Republic of Azerbaijan,
on the south by Iran, and on the west by Turkey.
Topography and Drainage
Twenty-five million years ago, a geological upheaval pushed up the
earth's crust to form the Armenian Plateau, creating the complex
topography of modern Armenia. The Lesser Caucasus range extends through
northern Armenia, runs southeast between Lake Sevan and Azerbaijan, then
passes roughly along the Armenian-Azerbaijani border to Iran. Thus
situated, the mountains make travel from north to south difficult.
Geological turmoil continues in the form of devastating earthquakes,
which have plagued Armenia. In December 1988, the second largest city in
the republic, Leninakan (now Gyumri), was heavily damaged by a massive
quake that killed more than 25,000 people.
About half of Armenia's area of approximately 29,800 square
kilometers has an elevation of at least 2,000 meters, and only 3 percent
of the country lies below 650 meters. The lowest points are in the
valleys of the Aras River and the Debet River in the far north, which
have elevations of 380 and 430 meters, respectively. Elevations in the
Lesser Caucasus vary between 2,640 and 3,280 meters. To the southwest of
the range is the Armenian Plateau, which slopes southwestward toward the
Aras River on the Turkish border. The plateau is masked by intermediate
mountain ranges and extinct volcanoes. The largest of these, Mount
Aragats, 4,430 meters high, is also the highest point in Armenia. Most
of the population lives in the western and northwestern parts of the
country, where the two major cities, Erevan and Gyumri (which was called
Aleksandropol' during the tsarist period), are located.
The valleys of the Debet and Akstafa rivers form the chief routes
into Armenia from the north as they pass through the mountains. Lake
Sevan, 72.5 kilometers across at its widest point and 376 kilometers
long, is by far the largest lake. It lies 2,070 meters above sea level
on the plateau. Terrain is most rugged in the extreme southeast, which
is drained by the Bargushat River, and most moderate in the Aras River
valley to the extreme southwest. Most of Armenia is drained by the Aras
or its tributary, the Razdan, which flows from Lake Sevan. The Aras
forms most of Armenia's border with Turkey and Iran as well as the
border between Azerbaijan's adjacent Nakhichevan Autonomous Republic and
Iran.
Armenia - Climate
A broad public discussion of environmental problems began in the
mid-1980s, when the first "green" groups formed in opposition
to Erevan's intense industrial air pollution and to nuclear power
generation in the wake of the 1986 reactor explosion at Chernobyl'.
Environmental issues helped form the basis of the nationalist
independence movement when environmental demonstrations subsequently
merged with those for other political causes in the late 1980s.
In the postcommunist era, Armenia faces the same massive
environmental cleanup that confronts the other former Soviet republics
as they emerge from the centralized planning system's disastrous
approach to resource management. By 1980 the infrequency of sightings of
Mount Ararat, which looms about sixty kilometers across the Turkish
border, became a symbol of worsening air pollution in Erevan.
In independent Armenia, environmental issues divide society (and
scientists) sharply into those who fear "environmental time
bombs" and those who view resumption of pollution-prone industrial
operations as the only means of improving the country's economy. In the
early 1990s, the latter group blamed Armenia's economic woes on the role
played by the former in closing major industries.
In 1994 three national environmental laws were in effect: the Law on
Environmental Protection, the Basic Law on the Environment, and the Law
on Mineral Resources. The Council of Ministers, Armenia's cabinet,
includes a minister of the environment. However, no comprehensive
environmental protection program has emerged, and decisions on
environmental policy have been made on an ad hoc basis.
Environmental conditions in Armenia have been worsened by the
Azerbaijani blockade of supplies and electricity from outside. Under
blockade conditions, the winters of 1991-92, 1992-93, and 1993-94
brought enormous hardship to a population lacking heat and electric
power. (The large-scale felling of trees for fuel during the winters of
the blockade has created another environmental crisis.) The results of
the blockade and the failure of diplomatic efforts to lift it led the
government to propose reconstruction of the Armenian Atomic Power
Station at Metsamor, which was closed after the 1988 earthquake because
of its location in an earthquake-prone area and which had the same
safety problems as reactors listed as dangerous in Bulgaria, Russia, and
Slovakia. After heated debates over startup continued through 1993,
French and Russian nuclear consultants declared operating conditions
basically safe. Continuation of the blockade into 1994 gave added
urgency to the decision.
Another environmental concern is a significant drop in Lake Sevan's
water level because of drawdowns for irrigation and the diversion of
water to hydroelectric plants to compensate for the electric power lost
through the inactivity of the nuclear plant at Metsamor. This crisis was
addressed in 1992-93 by construction of a tunnel to divert water into
the lake from the Arpa River. Engineers estimated that once the project
is finished, the tunnel will allow 500 million cubic meters of water to
be drawn from the lake annually, while maintaining a constant water
level. The Ministry of the Environment reported that the lake's water
level had dropped by fifty centimeters in 1993. Experts said that this
drop brought the level to within twenty-seven centimeters of the
critical point where flora and fauna would be endangered.
Among major industrial centers closed to curtail pollution were the
Nairit Chemical Plant, the Alaverdy Metallurgical Plant, and the
Vanadzor Chemical Combine. Economic requirements triumphed over
environmental considerations when the Soviet-era Nairit plant was
reopened in January 1992 after being closed in 1989 because of the
massive air pollution it caused. Newly independent Armenia needed the
income from foreign sales of Nairit rubber and chemical products, many
of which had been assigned exclusively to that plant under the Soviet
system and were still unavailable elsewhere to the former Soviet
republics in the early 1990s. Up-to-date environmental safety technology
and adherence to international standards were promised at Nairit when
the decision to resume production was announced.
Armenia - Population and Ethnic Composition
The forces of history have wrought dramatic changes on the boundaries
of the various Armenian states; the population's size and the ethnic
makeup of those states have also been strongly affected. In the
twentieth century, particularly significant changes resulted from
Turkish efforts to exterminate Armenians during World War I and from the
large-scale emigration of Azerbaijanis from Armenia in the early 1990s.
Population Characteristics
The origins of the Armenian people are obscure. According to ancient
Armenian writers, their people descend from Noah's son Japheth. A branch
of the Indo-Europeans, the Armenians are linked ethnically to the
Phrygians, who migrated from Thrace in southeastern Europe into Asia
Minor late in the second millennium B.C., and to the residents of the
kingdom of Urartu, with whom the Armenians came into contact around 800
B.C. after arriving in Asia Minor from the West. Although ethnologists
disagree about the precise timing and elements of this ethnic
combination (and even about the origin of the term Armenian),
it is generally agreed that the modern Armenians have been a distinct
ethnic group centered in eastern Anatolia since at least 600 B.C.
In the nineteenth century, the Armenians were the most urban of the
Transcaucasian peoples, but they were also the most dispersed. A
merchant middle class was the most powerful social group among the
Armenians, although the church and secular intellectuals also provided
leadership. Armenians pioneered exploitation of the oil deposits in and
around Baku, and the economic growth of the ancient Georgian capital,
Tbilisi, was largely an enterprise of Armenian merchants and small
industrialists.
The massacres and displacements that occurred between 1895 and 1915
removed nearly all the Armenian population in the Turkish part of
historical Armenia. In 1965 the Soviet Union estimated that 3.2 million
Armenians lived in all its republics. The Turkish census the same year
showed only 33,000 Armenians in Turkey, most of them concentrated in the
far west in Istanbul. In 1988 Armenia's population declined by 176,000,
reversing a trend over the previous decade of average population growth
of 1.5 percent per year. According to the 1989 census, the population of
Armenia was about 3,288,000, an increase of 8 percent from the 1979
census figure. An official estimate in 1991 put the population at
3,354,000, an increase of 2 percent since 1989. In 1989 Armenians were
the eighth largest nationality in the former Soviet Union, totaling
4,627,000. At that time, only about twothirds of the Armenians in the
Soviet Union lived in Armenia. Some 11.5 percent lived in Russia, 9.4
percent in Georgia, 8.4 percent in Azerbaijan, and the remaining 4
percent in the other republics. In recent years, Armenian refugees from
Azerbaijan, Georgia, Russia, and the Central Asian republics have
settled in Armenia, compounding an already severe housing shortage. The
number of Armenians living in other countries, primarily France, Iran,
Lebanon, Syria, and the United States, has been estimated at between 3
million and 9 million.
In 1991 Armenia's population density, 112.6 persons per square
kilometer, was second only to that of Moldavia (now Moldova) among the
Soviet republics. About 68 percent of the population lives in urban
areas and 32 percent in rural areas. In 1990 Armenia's capital, Erevan,
had a population of 1.2 million, or about 37 percent of the population
of the republic; the second largest city, Gyumri, had 123,000 residents.
The twelfth largest city in the former Soviet Union, Erevan is the
second largest in the Caucasus region, after Tbilisi.
In 1979 Armenian families residing in Armenia averaged 4.5 persons,
including an average of 4.3 for urban families and 4.8 average for rural
families. This average was larger than those of the Baltic, Georgian,
Moldavian, and predominantly Slavic republics of the Soviet Union but
less than the family averages of the Soviet Muslim republics. In 1989
average life expectancy was 71.9 years (69.0 years for males and 74.7
years for females). The birth rate was 21.6 live births per 1,000
population; the death rate was 6.0 per 1,000.
Ethnically the most homogeneous of the Soviet republics, Armenia had
few problems with ethnic minorities during the Soviet period. According
to the last Soviet census, conducted in 1989, Armenians made up 93.3
percent of Armenia's population, Azerbaijanis 2.6 percent, Russians 1.6
percent, and Muslim Kurds and Yezidi (Christian Kurds) together 1.7
percent. Fewer than 30,000 others, including Greeks and Ukrainians,
lived in the republic in 1989. During the Soviet period, the republic's
largest non-Armenian group was the Azerbaijanis. By 1989, however,
almost all of the Azerbaijanis, who had numbered 161,000 in 1979, either
had been expelled or had emigrated from Armenia. The figure for the 1989
census included 77,000 Azerbaijanis who had returned to their native
country but were still considered residents of Armenia.
Armenia - Language, Culture, and Religion
Through the centuries, Armenians have conscientiously retained the
unique qualities of their language and art forms, incorporating
influences from surrounding societies without sacrificing distinctive
national characteristics. Religion also has been a strong unifying force
and has played a political role as well.
Language
The Armenian language is a separate Indo-European tongue sharing some
phonetic and grammatical features with other Caucasian languages, such
as Georgian. The Iranian languages contributed many loanwords related to
cultural subjects; the majority of the Armenian word stock shows no
connection with other existing languages, however, and some experts
believe it derives from extinct non-Indo-European languages. The
distinct alphabet of thirty-eight letters, derived from the Greek
alphabet, has existed since the early fifth century A.D. Classical
Armenian (grabar) is used today only in the Armenian Apostolic
Church as a liturgical language. Modern spoken Armenian is divided into
a number of dialects, the most important of which are the eastern
dialect (used in Armenia, the rest of Transcaucasia, and Iran) and the
western dialect (used extensively in Turkey and among Western émigrés).
The two major dialects differ in some vocabulary, pronunciation,
grammar, and orthography.
In the Soviet period, schools in Armenia taught in both Armenian and
Russian; in a republic where over 95 percent of the people claimed
Armenian as their native language, almost all of the urban population
and much of the rural population knew at least some Russian. At the end
of the Soviet period, 91.6 percent of Armenians throughout the Soviet
Union considered Armenian to be their native language, and 47.1 percent
of Armenians were fluent in Russian.
Armenia - Culture
The international Armenian community remains loyal to strong cultural
traditions, many of which have enriched the societies into which
Armenians emigrated. Cultural tradition has been a means of maintaining
a sense of national unity among widely dispersed groups of Armenians.
Literature and the Arts
The Armenians became active in literature and many art forms at a
very early point in their civilization. Urartian metalworking and
architecture have been traced back to about 1000 B.C. The beginning of
truly national art is usually fixed at the onset of the Christian era.
The three great artistic periods coincided with times of independence or
semi-independence: from the fifth to the seventh century; the Bagratid
golden age of the ninth and tenth centuries; and the era of the kingdom
of Lesser Armenia in the twelfth to fourteenth centuries.
Of especially high quality in the earlier periods were work in gold
and bronze, as well as temples, military fortifications, and aqueducts.
In the early Christian era, classical church architecture was adapted in
a series of cathedrals. The circular domes typical of Armenian churches
were copied in Western Europe and in Ottoman Turkey. The best example of
the distinctive architectural sculpture used to adorn such churches is
the early tenth-century Church of the Holy Cross on an island in Lake
Van. The architecture of contemporary Erevan is distinguished by the use
of pinkish tufa stone and a combination of traditional Armenian and
Russian styles.
Armenian painting is generally considered to have originated with the
illumination of religious manuscripts that thrived from the ninth to the
seventeenth century. Armenian painters in Cilicia and elsewhere enriched
Byzantine and Western formulas with their unique use of color and their
inclusion of Oriental themes acquired from the Mongols. Many unique
Armenian illuminated manuscripts remain in museums in the West.
The nineteenth century saw a blooming of Armenian painting. Artists
from that period, such as the portrait painter Hacop Hovnatanian and the
seascape artist Ivan Aivazovsky, continue to enjoy international
reputations. Notable figures of the twentieth century have included the
unorthodox Alexander Bazhbeuk-Melikian, who lived a persecuted existence
in Tbilisi, and the émigré surrealist Arshile Gorky (pseudonym of
Vosdanik Adoian), who greatly influenced a generation of young American
artists in New York. Other émigré painters in various countries have
continued the tradition as well.
The Armenian literary tradition began early in the fifth century A.D.
with religious tracts and histories of the Armenians. The most important
of these were written by Agathangelos, Egishe, Movses Khorenatsi, and
Pavstos Buzand. A secular literature developed in the early modern
period, and in the eighteenth century Armenian Catholic monks of the
Mekhitarist order began publishing ancient texts, modern histories,
grammars, and literature. In the nineteenth century, Armenians developed
their own journalism and public theater. Khachatur Abovian wrote the
first Armenian novel, Verk Haiastani (The Wounds of Armenia),
in the early 1840s. Armenian literature and drama often depict struggles
against religious and ethnic oppression and the aspirations of Armenians
for security and self-expression.
Armenia - National Traditions
Major Armenian holidays commemorate both religious and historical
events. Besides Christmas and Easter, the most important holidays are
Vartanants, the day marking the fifthcentury defense of Christianity
against the Persians, and April 24, which commemorates the 1915 genocide
of the Armenians in Turkey.
At times of celebration, Armenians enjoy traditional circle dances
and distinctive Eastern music. Their music and their cuisine are similar
to those of other Middle Eastern peoples. A typical Armenian meal might
include lamb, rice pilaf, eggplant, yogurt, and a sweet dessert such as paklava
(baklava). Armenians pride themselves on their close family ties,
hospitality, and reverence for their national language and culture, an
appreciation that is passed from one generation to the next.
Armenia - Religion
Mostly Christians since the early fourth century A.D., the Armenians
claim to represent the first state to adopt Christianity as an official
religion. The independent Armenian church considers its founders to have
been the apostles Bartholomew and Thaddeus and officially calls itself
the Armenian Apostolic Church. (It is also referred to as the Armenian
Orthodox Church or the Gregorian Church.) The conversion of Armenia by
Saint Gregory the Illuminator occurred by about A.D. 314, although the
traditional date is A.D. 306. Armenian Christians then remained under
the powerful combined religious and political jurisdiction of the
Byzantine Empire until the sixth century. At that point, the Armenian
church asserted its independence by breaking with the Byzantine doctrine
of Christ's dual (divine and earthly) nature, which had been expressed
officially by the Council of Chalcedon in A.D. 451.
Since the schism, the Armenian Apostolic Church has been in communion
only with the monophysite churches (those believing that the human and
divine natures of Christ constitute a unity) of Egypt, Syria, and
Ethiopia. Rather than embrace the monophysite doctrine, however, the
Armenian church holds that Christ had both a divine and a human nature,
inseparably combined in a complete humanity that was animated by a
rational soul. The Armenian church also rejects the juridical authority
of the pope and the doctrine of purgatory.
Although the Armenian Apostolic Church often is identified with the
Eastern Orthodox churches of Eastern Europe, Russia, and Georgia, the
Armenian church has been juridically and theologically independent since
the early Middle Ages. As a national church, it has played a vital role
in maintaining Armenian culture, through the preservation and expansion
of written traditions and as a cultural focus for Armenians scattered
around the world. In the long periods when Armenians did not have a
state of their own, their church was both a political and a spiritual
leader, and religion was at the center of the Armenian national
self-image. Under the millet system by which the Ottoman Empire
ruled subject peoples, the patriarch of Constantinople was recognized as
the head of the Armenian community, and the Russian tsarist empire
treated the catholicos, the titular head of the Armenian Apostolic
Church, as the most important representative of the Armenian people.
The Armenian Apostolic Church is headed by Vazgen I, supreme
catholicos of all Armenians, who resides in the holy city of Echmiadzin,
west of Erevan. The membership of the church is split between a majority
that recognizes the supreme catholicos without qualification and a
minority that recognizes the catholicos of Cilicia, whose seat is at
Antilyas in Lebanon. Closely affiliated with the Armenian Revolutionary
Federation (ARF), the minority branch of the church was hostile to any
accommodation with communist regimes while Armenia was under Soviet
rule. Both branches of the church have been closely identified with the
movement for national independence, however. A split occurred within the
United States membership of the Armenian Apostolic Church in 1933, when
ARF sympathizers assassinated the Armenian archbishop of New York. Two
factions remained distinct in the United States in the early 1990s.
Two additional patriarchates in Jerusalem and Istanbul lack the
status of full catholicates. Three dioceses are located in other former
Soviet republics, and twenty bishoprics function in other countries.
Total church membership was estimated at 4 million in 1993. The Armenian
Orthodox Academy and one seminary provide religious training.
About 94 percent of the population of Armenia belongs to the Armenian
Apostolic Church. Small Roman Catholic and Protestant communities also
exist in Armenia. Catholic missionaries began converting Armenians in
the Ottoman and Persian empires in the early modern era, and American
Protestant missionaries were active in the nineteenth century. The
Kurdish population, which totaled 56,000 in 1993, is mostly Muslim but
also includes many Christians. Kurds now constitute the largest Muslim
group in Armenia because most Azerbaijani Muslim emigrated in the early
1990s. A Russian Orthodox community also exists.
Armenia - The Armenian Diaspora
Beginning in the eleventh century, a long series of invasions,
migrations, conversions, deportations, and massacres reduced Armenians
to a minority population in their historic homeland on the Armenian
Plateau. Under these conditions, a large-scale Armenian diaspora of
merchants, clerics, and intellectuals reached cities in Russia, Poland,
Western Europe, and India. Most Armenians remaining in historical
Armenia under the Ottoman Empire in the fifteenth century survived as
peasant farmers in eastern Anatolia, but others resettled in
Constantinople, Smyrna, and other cities in the empire. There they
became artisans, moneylenders, and traders. In the nineteenth century,
the political uncertainties that beset the Ottoman Empire prompted
further insecurity in the Armenian population. Finally, the Young Turk
government either massacred or forcibly removed the vast majority of
Armenians from the eastern Anatolian provinces in 1915.
Today about half the world's Armenians live outside Armenia. Armenian
communities have emerged in the Middle East, Russia, Poland, Western
Europe, India, and North America, where Armenians have gained a
reputation for their skill in crafts and in business. Although accurate
statistics are not available, the Armenian diaspora is about equally
divided between the 1.5 million Armenians in the other republics of the
former Soviet Union and a similar number in the rest of the world. The
postcommunist Republic of Armenia has officially defined the Armenian
nation to include the far-flung diaspora, a policy in accord with the
feelings of many diaspora Armenians.
A common theme in Armenian discourse is the need to preserve the
culture and heritage of the Armenian people through education and
mobilization of younger members of the community. In this task, the
Republic of Armenia enjoys the enthusiastic support of the international
Armenian community, which sees a new opportunity to impart information
to the rest of the world about Armenian culture--and especially to
rectify perceived inattention to the tragedy of 1915.
The Armenian diaspora maintains its coherence through the church,
political parties (despite their mutual hostilities), charitable
organizations, and a network of newspapers published in Armenian and
other languages. Armenian émigrés in the United States have endowed
eight university professorships in Armenian studies. With the
reemergence of an independent Armenia, diaspora Armenians have
established industries, a technical university, exchange programs, and
medical clinics in Armenia. Several prominent diaspora Armenians have
served in the Armenian government.
Armenia - Education, Health, and Social Welfare
In the first years of independence, Armenia made uneven progress in
establishing systems to meet its national requirements in social
services. Education, held in particular esteem in Armenian culture,
changed fastest of the social services, while health and welfare
services attempted to maintain the basic state-planned structure of the
Soviet era.
Education
A literacy rate of 100 percent was reported as early as 1960. In the
communist era, Armenian education followed the standard Soviet model of
complete state control (from Moscow) of curricula and teaching methods
and close integration of education activities with other aspects of
society, such as politics, culture, and the economy. As in the Soviet
period, primary and secondary school education in Armenia is free, and
completion of secondary school is compulsory. In the early 1990s,
Armenia made substantial changes to the centralized and regimented
Soviet system. Because at least 98 percent of students in higher
education were Armenian, curricula began to emphasize Armenian history
and culture. Armenian became the dominant language of instruction, and
many schools that had taught in Russian closed by the end of 1991.
Russian was still widely taught, however, as a second language.
In the 1990-91 school year, the estimated 1,307 primary and secondary
schools were attended by 608,800 students. Another seventy specialized
secondary institutions had 45,900 students, and 68,400 students were
enrolled in a total of ten postsecondary institutions that included
universities. In addition, 35 percent of eligible children attended
preschools. In the 1988-89 school year, 301 students per 10,000
population were in specialized secondary or higher education, a figure
slightly lower than the Soviet average. In 1989 some 58 percent of
Armenians over age fifteen had completed their secondary education, and
14 percent had a higher education. In 1992 Armenia's largest institution
of higher learning, Erevan State University, had eighteen departments,
including ones for social sciences, sciences, and law. Its faculty
numbered about 1,300 teachers and its student population about 10,000
students. The Erevan Architecture and Civil Engineering Institute was
founded in 1989. Eight other institutions of higher learning, all
located in Erevan, teach agriculture, fine arts and theater, economics,
music, applied science and technology, medicine, pedagogy and foreign
languages, and veterinary medicine.
Armenia - Health
The social and economic upheavals that followed the earthquake of
1988 combined with the political collapse of the Soviet Union to create
a catastrophic public health situation in Armenia. According to Soviet
statistics published between 1989 and 1991, the incidence of
tuberculosis, viral hepatitis, and cancer were among the lowest in the
Soviet republics. In 1990 the rates of infant mortality and maternal
mortality, 17.1 and 34.6 per 1,000 population, respectively, were also
among the lowest rates in the Soviet Union.
The level of medical care declined rapidly in the late 1980s and the
early 1990s, however, largely because of the Azerbaijani blockade and
the additional stress caused by war casualties. Even in 1990, Armenia
ranked lowest among the republics in hospital beds per 1,000 population
and exactly the Soviet Union average for doctors per 1,000 population.
Before 1991 Armenia had acquired stocks of medical supplies and
equipment, thanks largely to the Western aid projects that followed the
1988 earthquake. By 1992, however, the trade blockade had made the
supply of such basic items as surgical gloves, syringes, and chlorine
for water purification unreliable. In the escalating medical crisis that
resulted from this vulnerability, elderly people and newborns were
particularly at risk; in late 1992 and early 1993, healthy infants
reportedly were dying in hospitals because of the cold and the lack of
adequate equipment.
In December 1992, President Ter-Petrosian declared Armenia a disaster
area and appealed to the UN Security Council to focus on the crisis in
the republic. Government officials estimated that without emergency
humanitarian aid some 30,000 people would die. Early in 1993, the United
States launched Operation Winter Rescue to send needed assistance to
Armenia. In June Project Hope sent US$3.9 million worth of medicine from
the United States. From mid-1992 to mid-1993, United States medical
assistance totaled US$20 million.
All hospitals in Armenia are under the jurisdiction of the Ministry
of Health or the Erevan Health Department. In 1993 about 29,900 hospital
beds were available. Hospitals generally had surgical, physical therapy,
pediatric, obstetric/gynecological, and infectious disease wards. But
according to reports, by 1993 more than half the hospitals in Armenia
had ceased functioning because electricity, heat, or supplies were
lacking.
Thirty-seven polyclinics serve the rural areas, which have no
comprehensive health centers; such clinics are each designated to
provide basic medical services to about 10,000 people. Sixty-two
outpatient centers specialize in child or adult medicine in urban areas.
Immunizations against certain diseases are given to most infants before
they are one year old: in 1991 some 95 percent of infants were immunized
against poliomyelitis, 88 percent against diphtheria, and 86 percent
against pertussis.
Between 1986 and 1994, two cases of acquired immune deficiency
syndrome (AIDS) were reported in Armenia: one foreigner who was
subsequently deported, and one Armenian who contracted the disease in
Tanzania and was treated in Armenia. Experts believe that the
Azerbaijani blockade has acted to limit the incidence of AIDS. Although
no AIDS clinics are operating, some research has been conducted. In 1992
Armenian scientists announced the discovery of a possible treatment
compound.
Armenia - Social Welfare
At the beginning of the twentieth century, the territory of
present-day Armenia was a backward agricultural region with some copper
mining and cognac production. From 1914 through 1921, Caucasian Armenia
suffered from war, revolution, the influx of refugees from Turkish
Armenia, disease, hunger, and economic misery. About 200,000 people died
in 1919 alone. At that point, only American relief efforts saved Armenia
from total collapse.
The first Soviet Armenian government regulated economic activity
stringently, nationalizing all economic enterprises, requisitioning
grain from peasants, and suppressing most private market activity. This
first experiment in state control ended with the advent of Soviet leader
Vladimir I. Lenin's New Economic Policy (NEP) of 1921-27. This policy
continued state control of the large enterprises and banks, but peasants
could market much of their grain and small businesses could function. In
Armenia the NEP years brought partial recovery from the economic
disaster of the post-World War I period. By 1926 agricultural production
in Armenia had reached nearly three-quarters of its prewar level.
By the end of the 1920s, Stalin's regime had revoked the NEP and
established a state monopoly on all economic activity. Once this
occurred, the main goal of Soviet economic policy in Armenia was to turn
a predominantly agrarian and rural republic into an industrial and urban
one. Among other restrictions, peasants now were forced to sell nearly
all their output to state procurement agencies rather than at the
market. From the 1930s through the 1960s, an industrial infrastructure
was constructed. Besides hydroelectric plants and canals, roads were
built and gas pipelines were laid to bring fuel and food from Azerbaijan
and Russia.
The Stalinist command economy, in which market forces were suppressed
and all orders for production and distribution came from state
authorities, survived in all its essential features until the fall of
the Soviet government in 1991. In the early stages of the communist
economic revolution, Armenia underwent a fundamental transformation into
a "proletarian" society. Between 1929 and 1939, the percentage
of Armenia's work force categorized as industrial workers grew from 13
percent to 31 percent. By 1935 industry supplied 62 percent of Armenia's
economic production. Highly integrated and sheltered within the
artificial barter economy of the Soviet system from the 1930s until the
end of the communist era, the Armenian economy showed few signs of
self-sufficiency at any time during that period. In 1988 Armenia
produced only 0.9 percent of the net material product of the Soviet
Union (1.2 percent of industry, 0.7 percent of agriculture). The
republic retained 1.4 percent of total state budget revenue, delivered
63.7 percent of its NMP to other republics, and exported only 1.4
percent of what it produced to markets outside the Soviet Union.
Armenian industry was especially dependent on the Soviet
military-industrial complex. About 40 percent of all enterprises in the
republic were devoted to defense, and some factories lost 60 to 80
percent of their business in the last years of the Soviet Union, when
massive cuts were made in national defense expenditures. As the
republic's economy faces the prospect of competing in world markets in
the mid-1990s, the greatest liabilities of Armenian industry are its
outdated equipment and infrastructure and the pollution emitted by many
of the country's heavy industrial plants.
Armenia - Natural Resources
Although Armenia was one of the first places where humans smelted
iron, copper is the most important raw material mined there today.
Deposits of zinc, molybdenum, gold, silver, bauxite, obsidian, and
semiprecious stones, as well as marble, granite, and other building
materials, are also present. Significant expansion is believed possible
in the exploitation of most of those materials, which until the
mid-1990s had been largely untouched. Some oil deposits have been
identified, but the complex geology of the region makes recovery
difficult and expensive. In 1993 an American expedition tentatively
identified further deposits of natural gas and oil, but exploitation was
not expected for several years.
Armenia - Agriculture
Armenia has 486,000 hectares of arable land, about 16 percent of the
country's total area. In 1991 Armenia imported about 65 percent of its
food. About 10 percent of the work force, which is predominantly urban,
is employed in agriculture, which in 1991 provided 25.7 percent of the
country's NMP. In 1990 Armenia became the first Soviet republic to pass
a land privatization law, and from that time Armenian farmland shifted
into the private sector at a faster rate than in any other republic.
However, the rapidity and disorganization of land reallocation led to
disputes and dissatisfaction among the peasants receiving land.
Especially problematic were allocation of water rights and distribution
of basic materials and equipment. Related enterprises such as food
processing and hothouse operations often remained in state hands,
reducing the advantages of private landholding.
By 1992 privatization of the state and collective farms, which had
dominated Armenian agriculture in the Soviet period, had put 63 percent
of cultivated fields, 80 percent of orchards, and 91 percent of
vineyards in the hands of private farmers. The program yielded a 15
percent increase in agricultural output between 1990 and 1991. In 1993
the government ended restrictions on the transfer of private land, a
step expected to increase substantially the average size (and hence the
efficiency) of private plots. At the end of 1993, an estimated 300,000
small farms (one to five hectares) were operating. In that year,
harvests were bountiful despite the high cost of inputs; only the
disastrous state of Armenia's transportation infrastructure prevented
relief of food shortages in urban centers.
Agriculture is carried out mainly in the valleys and mountainsides of
Armenia's uneven terrain, with the highest mountain pastures used for
livestock grazing. Fertile volcanic soil allows cultivation of wheat and
barley as well as pasturage for sheep, goats, and horses. With the help
of irrigation, figs, pomegranates, cotton, apricots, and olives also are
grown in the limited subtropical Aras River valley and in the valleys
north of Erevan, where the richest farmland is found. Armenia also
produces peaches, walnuts, and quince, and its cognac enjoys a worldwide
reputation.
Irrigation is required by most crops, and the building of canals and
a system of irrigation was among the first major state projects of the
Soviet republic in the 1920s. By the 1960s, arable land had been
extended by 20 percent, compared with pre-Soviet times. Most farms had
electricity by the early 1960s, and machinery was commonplace. In the
Soviet era, women made up most of the agricultural work force; a large
percentage of the younger men had responded to the Soviet
industrialization campaign by migrating to urban centers. In 1989 farms
were operating about 13,400 tractors and 1,900 grain and cotton
combines.
The principal agricultural products are grains (mostly wheat and
barley), potatoes, vegetables, grapes, berries, cotton, sugar beets,
tobacco, figs, and olives. In 1989 Armenia produced 200,000 tons of
grain, 266,000 tons of potatoes, 485,000 tons of vegetables, 117,000
tons of sugar beets, 170,000 tons of fruit, 119,000 tons of grapes,
105,000 tons of meat, 491,000 tons of milk, and 561,000 tons of eggs.
Armenia - Industry
The most important elements of Armenian heavy industry are metal
working, machinery manufacture, electronics, and the production of
chemicals, petrochemicals, fertilizers, and building materials. In 1993,
with the aid of British and Russian specialists, a chemical combine was
designed to streamline production and marketing of Armenia's chemical
products, which had been among the republic's most profitable outputs in
the Soviet system. In the later Soviet period, the country became known
for its high-quality scientific research, particularly in computer
science, nuclear and elementary particle physics, and astrophysics. An
estimated 30 percent of Armenia's industrial production infrastructure
was destroyed or damaged by the earthquake of 1988.
In the Soviet period, Armenian industry contributed trucks, tires,
elevators, electronics, and instruments to the union economy, but
several of the plants in those sectors also were lost in 1988. In the
years of the Azerbaijani blockade, heavy industrial production has
declined sharply because the supply of fuels and electricity has been
limited and the price of raw materials has become prohibitive.
Armenian plants were an important part of the Soviet military
industrial complex, producing a variety of equipment. In the early
1990s, the Armenian Ministry of Defense attempted to reestablish
agreements with the defense establishments of Russia and other member
countries of the Commonwealth of Independent States. Such a move would
enable Armenia to resume production of sophisticated electronic air
defense components, which would significantly bolster the domestic
economy.
Armenia's most important light consumer products are knitted clothing
and hosiery, canned goods, aluminum foil for food packaging, and shoes.
Most durable consumer goods are imported. In 1993 production of consumer
products declined even more sharply than other sectors. Food imports
increased dramatically to compensate for a 58 percent drop in domestic
food processing from 1991 to 1992.
Overall industrial production in 1993 was about 60 percent of that in
1992, but the percentage rose steadily through 1993 after a very slow
beginning. Food production for 1993, however, was only 50 percent of the
1992 amount, retail sales were 58 percent, and paid services to the
population were 32 percent.
Armenia - Energy
In 1990 Armenia produced less than 1 percent of its energy
requirement, which was filled by imports from Russia (50 percent) and
other republics of the Soviet Union. In the late Soviet era, Armenia had
a share in the Joint Transcaucasian Power Grid, but that arrangement and
short-term supply agreements with Azerbaijan ended with the
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. The 1988 earthquake destroyed the largest
nonnuclear thermoelectric plant; two remaining plants are located south
of Erevan and near Razdan, northeast of Erevan.
Hydroelectric plants provide 30 percent of domestic electricity, but
the output of the largest producer, the Razdan Hydroelectric Plant, was
cut drastically because of its negative effect on the water level of its
source, Lake Sevan. By early 1994, however, a fifth hydroelectric
generating unit was under construction, with international funding, to
help alleviate the energy shortage. Planners are also considering
construction of two medium-sized hydroelectric stations on the Dzoraget
and Debet rivers in the far north, or 300 to 450 small stations on
lakes. The obstacle to such plans is the high cost of importing
technology.
In the early 1990s, severe shortages of energy led to blackouts,
periodic shutdowns of the subway system, inadequate heating of urban
buildings, and the further decline of industry. Schools, institutes, and
universities were closed through the winters of 1991-92 and 1992-93.
In the 1980s, Soviet planners had attempted to improve Armenia's
power generation capacity by building the Armenian Atomic Power Station
at Metsamor. However, that station's two reactors were shut down after
the 1988 earthquake to avoid future earthquake damage that might cause
an environmental catastrophe. The heat and power crisis caused by the
Azerbaijani blockade instituted in 1991 caused the government to
reconsider use of Metsamor, despite the station's location in
earthquake-prone northern Armenia and the possibility of a terrorist
attack that could release large amounts of radiation.
In 1993 Metsamor had an estimated capacity to provide 20 percent of
Armenia's energy requirements. Plans were made for startup of one of the
two reactors by 1995 after careful equipment testing and international
technical assistance--with the provision that the plant would remain
closed if alternative sources of power could relieve the acute shortage
of the prior three years.
In 1993 the delivery of electric power to industrial consumers was
cut to one-third of the 1992 level. Under continued blockade conditions,
the winter of 1993-94 brought acute shortages of coal, heating oil, and
kerosene to heat homes and city apartment buildings and to keep
industries running. Significant deposits of high-quality coal have been
identified in Armenia, with holdings estimated at 100 million tons. But
exploitation would require massive deforestation, a consequence that is
considered environmentally prohibitive. In September 1993, Turkmenistan
agreed to deliver 8.5 million cubic meters of natural gas per day during
the winter, as well as kerosene and diesel fuel in 1994. (Turkmenistan
was already an important fuel supplier to postcommunist Armenia.)
Although Georgia guaranteed full cooperation in maintaining gas delivery
through its pipeline into Armenia, in 1993 explosions on the line
interrupted the flow twelve times. Azerbaijani groups in Georgia were
assumed to be responsible for the bombings.
Source: U.S. Library of Congress