MONGABAY.COM
Mongabay.com seeks to raise interest in and appreciation of wild lands and wildlife, while examining the impact of emerging trends in climate, technology, economics, and finance on conservation and development (more)
WEEKLY NEWSLETTER
|
|
Israel
Index
Autonomy was another cornerstone of Israeli strategic doctrine,
but autonomy did not mean independence. The Israeli military
acknowledged a heavy dependence on the United States as a supplier
of military matériel and as a deterrent to possible Soviet
intervention on the side of the Arabs during times of war.
Precisely because of this dependence, however, Israel felt it
necessary to take autonomous action--often in defiance of strong
United States objections. In numerous actions, such as the 1973
encirclement of the Egyptian Third Army and the 1982 siege of West
Beirut, Israel signaled to Washington that its national interests
were not always congruent with those of the United States. More
important, Israel proved to its Arab adversaries that despite any
political pressure they exerted on Washington, the United States
could not extract concessions from Israel. Another dimension of
autonomy was that Israel would not make a settlement with the Arabs
by placing itself in an indefensible position in return for
security guarantees from the United States. In general, foreign
policy was subservient to defense policy, and Israeli policy makers
felt that Israel should never sacrifice its strategic strength for
improved foreign relations with the United States, the Arab states,
or other countries, even if such improved relations made war less
likely. As Dayan said, "Israel has no foreign policy--only a
defense policy."
Data as of December 1988
|
|